From: Keith W. <ke...@vm...> - 2010-03-10 15:24:48
|
On Wed, 2010-03-10 at 07:18 -0800, Corbin Simpson wrote: > On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 6:59 AM, Keith Whitwell <ke...@vm...> wrote: > > It's great you found a bug, but why all the excitement? Just track it > > down and propose a fix. Mesa's pretty well debugged, but there are > > always going to be new issues. I'm not sure why it warrants this type > > of implicit criticism when you come across something new. > > I wasn't aware of any implicit criticism in my post. If I said > something wrong, I'm sorry; I'm a little bit fried from studying for a > final, and what started as a relaxing diversion from math review has > kind of turned into a multi-package bug and increased my frustration > more than just a bit. > > I'll check the specs later and see if there's validation code missing, > and also see if Wine needs similar patches. > > Again, sorry and thanks. No problem Corbin. I suspect this is because DX9 allows negative offset values in some surprising places. Basically I think you've hit two bugs - one wine is trying to send Mesa an illegal negative value instead of translating it away somehow, and secondly we are accepting it... Ketih |