From: Brian P. <br...@vm...> - 2009-12-29 16:18:31
|
tom fogal wrote: > Sam Geeraerts <sa...@el...> writes: >> "Please be careful not to read the notice any further than it goes. >> In particular: it only applies to what Mark wrote, and it only >> applies to whatever code of his existed in libglut when he sent his >> reply to Debian. Nothing anybody else wrote, and nothing that wasn't >> in libglut at the time." >> >> So if we can show that your glut.h was initially based on that of >> the GLUT package then we'd be a big step closer to a solution. I've >> compared the GLUT 3.7 tarball [3] to your initial commit [4], but >> there are some differences. > > I suspect you'll need Brian to weigh in on the history, but as I recall > there was a TODO about changing the glut included in Mesa to freeglut, > which I imagine has a much more amenable license for your project. I > can't seem to find it now, though... I don't plan on switching to freeglut in the Mesa tree. There are (were?) a few implementation differences between the two libraries that caused some grief (pop-up menus were one). -Brian |