Menu
▾
▴
mesa3d-dev
|
From: Ian R. <id...@fr...> - 2010-02-20 01:17:55
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 While we're on the topic of removing dead weight, can we remove support for color index rendering? None of the hardware drivers support color index rendering, and color index rendering is deprecated in OpenGL 3.0 (and removed in 3.1). Can it please die in a fire? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkt/Kd8ACgkQX1gOwKyEAw+zpQCgj+Yr0Bo3e6O3BijR5KYEds48 DfIAniZibZEaXZsO0qYa9OW5745LM9xL =tcrK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
|
From: Corbin S. <mos...@gm...> - 2010-02-20 03:43:49
|
Can we doc it and comment it out? IME somebody will pop out and claim a use for it. Posting from a mobile, pardon my terseness. ~ C. On Feb 19, 2010 5:19 PM, "Ian Romanick" <id...@fr...> wrote: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 While we're on the topic of removing dead weight, can we remove support for color index rendering? None of the hardware drivers support color index rendering, and color index rendering is deprecated in OpenGL 3.0 (and removed in 3.1). Can it please die in a fire? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkt/Kd8ACgkQX1gOwKyEAw+zpQCgj+Yr0Bo3e6O3BijR5KYEds48 DfIAniZibZEaXZsO0qYa9OW5745LM9xL =tcrK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ Mesa3d-dev mailing list Mes...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mesa3d-dev |
|
From: Ian R. <id...@fr...> - 2010-02-21 22:47:25
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Corbin Simpson wrote: > Can we doc it and comment it out? IME somebody will pop out and claim a > use for it. Search the Mesa source for all of the occurances of 'if (ctx->Visual.rgbMode)' and you'll see most of the reason I want to remove it. Commenting it out or ifdef'ing it out will actually make the situation much, much worse. Part of the reason I want to do this is that I'm working on an extension that allows the creation of a context without a visual / fbconfig. I have this mostly working, and I should have patches out early this week. The biggest hurdle has been "fixing" all of the places that use ctx->Visual. 90% or more of those places are checking rgbMode. Ideally, I'd like ctx->Visual to be completely removed. 99.9% of all places that use ctx->Visual should actually use ctx->DrawBuffer->Visual. I suspect that this accounts for some of the FBO rendering problems that have been reported over the years. > Posting from a mobile, pardon my terseness. ~ C. > >> On Feb 19, 2010 5:19 PM, "Ian Romanick" <id...@fr... >> <mailto:id...@fr...>> wrote: >> > While we're on the topic of removing dead weight, can we remove support > for color index rendering? None of the hardware drivers support color > index rendering, and color index rendering is deprecated in OpenGL 3.0 > (and removed in 3.1). > > Can it please die in a fire? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkuBt+QACgkQX1gOwKyEAw+8DACfSXYLr9mh1k06Ri+29NBjNKfn wSYAnjRD3Eu4ZpeSkgOiBIOk7h1d2pJw =LhpN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
|
From: Kristian H. <kr...@bi...> - 2010-02-25 22:12:33
|
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 10:43 PM, Corbin Simpson <mos...@gm...> wrote: > Can we doc it and comment it out? IME somebody will pop out and claim a use > for it. With git, which lets you search and query history fast and easily, there's never really and excuse for commenting/#ifdef'ing something out. If somebody wants to revive CI rendering, digging it out from git is going to be the least of his problems. Kristian > Posting from a mobile, pardon my terseness. ~ C. > > On Feb 19, 2010 5:19 PM, "Ian Romanick" <id...@fr...> wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > While we're on the topic of removing dead weight, can we remove support > for color index rendering? None of the hardware drivers support color > index rendering, and color index rendering is deprecated in OpenGL 3.0 > (and removed in 3.1). > > Can it please die in a fire? > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ > > iEYEARECAAYFAkt/Kd8ACgkQX1gOwKyEAw+zpQCgj+Yr0Bo3e6O3BijR5KYEds48 > DfIAniZibZEaXZsO0qYa9OW5745LM9xL > =tcrK > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval > Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs > proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. > See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev > _______________________________________________ > Mesa3d-dev mailing list > Mes...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mesa3d-dev > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval > Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs > proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. > See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev > _______________________________________________ > Mesa3d-dev mailing list > Mes...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mesa3d-dev > > |
|
From: Patrice M. <man...@or...> - 2010-02-20 10:33:41
|
Le Fri, 19 Feb 2010 16:16:32 -0800 Ian Romanick <id...@fr...> a écrit: > While we're on the topic of removing dead weight, can we remove support > for color index rendering? None of the hardware drivers support color > index rendering, and color index rendering is deprecated in OpenGL 3.0 > (and removed in 3.1). > > Can it please die in a fire? Well, I think it could be done for Gallium backends. Nvidia hw supports color indexed textures from nv04 (TNT) to nv30 (Geforce FX). It was removed since nv40. Do you want it to be removed in all hardware backends (i.e. also dri ones) ? -- Patrice Mandin WWW: http://pmandin.atari.org/ Programmeur Linux, Atari Spécialité: Développement, jeux |
|
From: Ian R. <id...@fr...> - 2010-02-21 22:40:11
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Patrice Mandin wrote: > Le Fri, 19 Feb 2010 16:16:32 -0800 > Ian Romanick <id...@fr...> a écrit: > >> While we're on the topic of removing dead weight, can we remove support >> for color index rendering? None of the hardware drivers support color >> index rendering, and color index rendering is deprecated in OpenGL 3.0 >> (and removed in 3.1). >> >> Can it please die in a fire? > > Well, I think it could be done for Gallium backends. Nvidia hw supports > color indexed textures from nv04 (TNT) to nv30 (Geforce FX). It was > removed since nv40. > > Do you want it to be removed in all hardware backends (i.e. also dri > ones) ? I'm talking about rendering *to* a color index target. As far as I'm aware, none of the hardware drivers have ever supported this. Color index textures are an orthogonal issue, and they can stay. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkuBtiwACgkQX1gOwKyEAw/0FQCgkFgSZsGnnZZFoe/b+EAUC2hZ SvkAnjsKwvUMYJspDVmwq2s/lo3FSFb+ =mJcX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
|
From: Brian P. <bri...@gm...> - 2010-02-22 15:34:31
|
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 5:16 PM, Ian Romanick <id...@fr...> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > While we're on the topic of removing dead weight, can we remove support > for color index rendering? None of the hardware drivers support color > index rendering, and color index rendering is deprecated in OpenGL 3.0 > (and removed in 3.1). > > Can it please die in a fire? I think it can probably go. I haven't tested CI mode rendering in many years. Who knows if it even works any more. -Brian |
|
From: Eric A. <er...@an...> - 2010-02-22 16:03:54
|
On Fri, 19 Feb 2010 16:16:32 -0800, Ian Romanick <id...@fr...> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > While we're on the topic of removing dead weight, can we remove support > for color index rendering? None of the hardware drivers support color > index rendering, and color index rendering is deprecated in OpenGL 3.0 > (and removed in 3.1). > > Can it please die in a fire? I don't see any plausible justification for CI rendering support. I'd love to see it die. |
|
From: Nathan K. <nat...@sp...> - 2010-02-22 16:26:22
|
On 10-02-19 07:16 PM, Ian Romanick wrote: > While we're on the topic of removing dead weight, can we remove support > for color index rendering? None of the hardware drivers support color > index rendering, and color index rendering is deprecated in OpenGL 3.0 > (and removed in 3.1). > > Can it please die in a fire? As a workaround if someone really wants CI rendering, one can use VirtualGL to provide a CI visual on RGB-only hardware. -Nathan |
|
From: Ian R. <id...@fr...> - 2010-02-27 02:20:24
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Ian Romanick wrote: > While we're on the topic of removing dead weight, can we remove support > for color index rendering? None of the hardware drivers support color > index rendering, and color index rendering is deprecated in OpenGL 3.0 > (and removed in 3.1). > > Can it please die in a fire? I have just pushed a branch that removes color-index rendering. It is available for review in the remove_ci_rendering branch of git://anongit.freedesktop.org/~idr/mesa.git. I have done on minimal testing so far, but I intend to do more over the weekend. It took most of the week just to get all the changes made. There are 38 individual patches. The patches remove a total of 2,304 lines of code. I tried to make it easier to review by keeping the individual changes small. There are probably some additional changes that could be made. There is still a bit of index tracking in TNL and other related places. I think some of this can be removed. Such removals would be more invasive (grep for MAT_*_INDEX), and may impact our adherence to the spec. For example, some queries would return incorrect values. In any case, I'm satisfied with this set of removals for now. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkuIgUMACgkQX1gOwKyEAw8E+gCdGWJYc1sGhvkeT/Ikg57LcSQb mNMAn3ks/Xa6Z1z2ziOvqlCP/742OCO+ =oXSE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
|
From: Brian P. <bri...@gm...> - 2010-03-02 15:04:59
|
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 7:19 PM, Ian Romanick <id...@fr...> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Ian Romanick wrote: >> While we're on the topic of removing dead weight, can we remove support >> for color index rendering? None of the hardware drivers support color >> index rendering, and color index rendering is deprecated in OpenGL 3.0 >> (and removed in 3.1). >> >> Can it please die in a fire? > > I have just pushed a branch that removes color-index rendering. It is > available for review in the remove_ci_rendering branch of > git://anongit.freedesktop.org/~idr/mesa.git. I have done on minimal > testing so far, but I intend to do more over the weekend. It took most > of the week just to get all the changes made. > > There are 38 individual patches. The patches remove a total of 2,304 > lines of code. I tried to make it easier to review by keeping the > individual changes small. > > There are probably some additional changes that could be made. There is > still a bit of index tracking in TNL and other related places. I think > some of this can be removed. Such removals would be more invasive (grep > for MAT_*_INDEX), I think you mean the MAT_INDEX_* tokens there. We can weed out some of that little stuff over time. > and may impact our adherence to the spec. For > example, some queries would return incorrect values. > > In any case, I'm satisfied with this set of removals for now. The branch looks good. Just one minor thing: please document CI removal in the 7.8 release notes file. -Brian |
×
Want the latest updates on software, tech news, and AI?
Get latest updates about software, tech news, and AI from SourceForge directly in your inbox once a month.
Thanks for helping keep SourceForge clean.
X