Re: [mesa-users] new net

[amber l. <amb...@gm...>]

Do you mean

​rne20pg_to_mg22 !(
ne20(p,g)na21(p,g)mg22)

or maybe

rne20_pg_na21

?

​The case

rne20pg_to_ne21

would possibly be ne20(p,g)na21(wk)ne21

but I don't see that listed in any of the nets.

or possibly

rne20ng_ne21?

if the pg was a mistake?​ Did you copy this from another MESA net or
another nuclear network program? I don't think reaction naming protocols
are necessarily uniform in all programs.

​As a follow up, how exactly is "to" used? I see it standing in for wk, I
think, as in (rn14ag_to_o18), for (p,g) as in the case above and several
others, and possibly for (n,g) in r_O17_to_O18. I found this in NET_NOTES,
but this doesn't seem to cover all the cases. Is it just a general
placeholder for important compound or multistep reactions that has no
specific meaning in the code?

====
 other reactions
         r_<inputs>_to_<outputs>
         where <inputs> and <outputs> are iso_name's separated by '_'
         if the same iso appears 2 or more times, repeat the name that many
times.
         e.g., triple alpha is r_he4_he4_he4_to_c12
         iso's ordered by increasing Z and N. e.g.,
r_h3_be7_to_neut_h1_he4_he4

====
On Jul 24, 2017 1:19 AM, "Josiah Schwab" <jws...@uc...> wrote:

Hi Bruno,

> The reactions seem correct ...

The reaction

  ne20(p,g)ne21

doesn't make sense.  It doesn't conserve charge.

Josiah

------------------------------------------------------------
------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
mesa-users mailing list
mes...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mesa-users