From: Theodore A. S. <ta...@MI...> - 2011-03-16 00:30:26
|
dear mesa-users: The entrainment of the henyey algorithm to progressively smaller time steps is a general consequence of the accentuation of shell thinness in low mass stars ascending the RGB, worsening inversely with mass and metallicity. Sub-stellar mass Pop. III stars thus exhibit the worst manifestation of this problem. However, in the star's quiescent climb up the RGB, you should graphically observe that, in the expanding shell front's frame of reference, the shell's profile appears almost structurally static. One physically sound resolution is to artificially propagate, or shift, the composition profile's outward using a larger time-step, interspersing this with smaller henyey chosen time steps. Harm and Scwarzschild adumbrated this "shell shifting" method during the late dark age of stellar modeling ( see sec. (d) the hydrogen burning shell, attached .pdf for RED GIANTS OF POPULATION II. IV ) Perhaps a more sophisticated version with an attendant "error" control could be incorporated into MESA. I would be interested to assist on this, especially on ascertaining the divergence between the brute force evolution and that incorporating a subset of shell shifting steps expediting the RGB ascent. My intuition is that, with the exception of detailed calculations of precise core mass and luminosity at the RGB tip, the error introduced via a judicious admixture of shifting steps could be negligible. I could be wrong, but, if not, the computational burden could be substantially alleviated, esp. if a large array of runs are required. Theodore Arthur Sande MIT Department of Physics ta...@mi... |