From: Bill P. <pa...@ki...> - 2008-12-04 20:34:12
|
Hi Marcin, On Dec 4, 2008, at 11:57 AM, Marcin @ astrophysics wrote: > I'm trying to reach Helium break-even point for stars with masses > around 1 Msun. None of my runs reached it. The lg_dt_yr value is > getting smaller and smaller and I wonder how much time would be > needed to reach Helium flash. One of the wonderful aspects of EZ was how fast it could do evolution up the RGB. EZ was based on Eggleton's code, and that was designed specifically for thin shell burning up the RGB. But I found that I couldn't generalize it to let me do other stuff reliably. So I've abandoned the EZ methods. So mesa/star is slow up the RGB as it follows the shell burning in detail. However, I have been able to reach the helium core flash and even continue through it to reach steady helium burning. But it currently requires some changes in parameter settings. Since its been some time since I've tried this, let me run some tests before I suggest what you should do. So, mesa/star is sometimes (much) slower than EZ, but there are many interesting things that mesa/star can do that I couldn't get EZ to do at all. > About 10 Msun stars cross Helium and Carbon break-evens. Great. I get that too. > And if we're talking about break-evens. What are the capabilities > of mesa in this area? Maybe it is possible to reach the point near > to supernova expolsion? The eos at high T is based on Frank Timmes' code and should be fine for advanced burning. The other parts of the mesa microphysics should also be capable of supporting this. The problem at the moment is the breakdown of the convergence of the structure equations. I'm currently working on a new approach to that problem, but it's too early to tell if it will work. In the meantime, I think you should be able to get stars of up to about 15Msun to go through carbon burning. And stars over about 2.5Msun should be fine to go through helium burning. And they should actually show helium shell flashes on the AGB. Here are some nets to try for helium and carbon burning: During helium burning, the nitrogen (n14) gets converted to o18 and then to ne22. That's worth following by itself for stars that will not reach carbon burning. For those, I use new_net_num = 65 ! Basic + o18 + ne22 The advanced burning stages after c12 are o16, ne20, mg24, si28, s32, etc. For carbon burning stars, I use new_net_num = 83 ! Basic + o18 + ne22 + alpha_mg24_to_s32 Cheers, Bill |