This list is closed, nobody may subscribe to it.
2007 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(2) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2008 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(6) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(8) |
Dec
(5) |
2009 |
Jan
(5) |
Feb
(1) |
Mar
(3) |
Apr
(4) |
May
(4) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(8) |
Oct
|
Nov
(1) |
Dec
(13) |
2010 |
Jan
|
Feb
(6) |
Mar
(4) |
Apr
(1) |
May
(10) |
Jun
(43) |
Jul
(37) |
Aug
(3) |
Sep
(6) |
Oct
(26) |
Nov
(17) |
Dec
(29) |
2011 |
Jan
(28) |
Feb
(18) |
Mar
(42) |
Apr
(18) |
May
(13) |
Jun
(32) |
Jul
(32) |
Aug
(25) |
Sep
(46) |
Oct
(41) |
Nov
(36) |
Dec
(43) |
2012 |
Jan
(92) |
Feb
(120) |
Mar
(40) |
Apr
(75) |
May
(40) |
Jun
(93) |
Jul
(115) |
Aug
(67) |
Sep
(38) |
Oct
(92) |
Nov
(95) |
Dec
(47) |
2013 |
Jan
(171) |
Feb
(200) |
Mar
(100) |
Apr
(134) |
May
(112) |
Jun
(142) |
Jul
(123) |
Aug
(66) |
Sep
(175) |
Oct
(236) |
Nov
(141) |
Dec
(98) |
2014 |
Jan
(91) |
Feb
(88) |
Mar
(126) |
Apr
(63) |
May
(123) |
Jun
(122) |
Jul
(105) |
Aug
(83) |
Sep
(114) |
Oct
(90) |
Nov
(181) |
Dec
(85) |
2015 |
Jan
(111) |
Feb
(120) |
Mar
(161) |
Apr
(95) |
May
(93) |
Jun
(185) |
Jul
(170) |
Aug
(119) |
Sep
(128) |
Oct
(110) |
Nov
(145) |
Dec
(92) |
2016 |
Jan
(105) |
Feb
(106) |
Mar
(101) |
Apr
(59) |
May
(96) |
Jun
(168) |
Jul
(110) |
Aug
(183) |
Sep
(85) |
Oct
(79) |
Nov
(87) |
Dec
(86) |
2017 |
Jan
(100) |
Feb
(77) |
Mar
(85) |
Apr
(52) |
May
(60) |
Jun
(63) |
Jul
(67) |
Aug
(24) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
|
Nov
(2) |
Dec
|
From: Bill P. <pa...@ki...> - 2008-11-11 14:20:14
|
On Nov 10, 2008, at 10:24 PM, Roni Waldman wrote: > What's wrong? Let's go back to check how mesa was installed. Did you do an svn checkout? That's currently the best way to go. The current release version is given in the "getting started" webpage as 743, so you'd do svn co -r 743 https://mesa.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/mesa/trunk mesa After the svn checkout finishes downloading lots of files, open mesa/utils/makefile_header and check that it's setup to use the fortran compiler you use. Once you've specified the compiler, the build is done by: cd mesa ./install This script goes through building and testing all of the required packages, finishing with mesa/star. You shouldn't have to do ./mk unless you've edited some source file. Let me know how it goes! Cheers, Bill |
From: Bill P. <pa...@ki...> - 2008-11-10 17:34:33
|
Hi, BTW: just a side-note: EZ was fast at what it could do, but it was pretty much impossible for me to make it do anything beyond what Eggleton's original code could do. With mesa I've tried to make the code much more flexible and robust, but you'll find places where this means much slower evolution as it cautiously tip-toes along. The climb up the rgb for low mass stars is a particularly striking case. You may want to let some of those run overnight! Cheers, Bill |
From: Bill P. <pa...@ki...> - 2008-11-10 15:43:20
|
On Nov 10, 2008, at 5:09 AM, Roni Waldman wrote: > I am interested in trying out mesa, > Where is the actual evolution code, and how do I run it? Hi Roni, I'm happy that you're interested in trying out mesa. The top-level stellar evolution package is "mesa/star". Like the other packages, mesa/star is organized with sources in public and private directories. In mesa/star/public you'll find procedures (in star_lib.f), stellar data (in star_data.dek), and control parameters (in star_controls.dek). Code that actually runs the mesa/star evolution package can be found in mesa/star/test/src. However, you shouldn't have to edit those files (at least not for now). Instead, the parameters of a run are read from a text file called 'inlist' that lives in the star/test directory. You can edit that file to pick things such as initial_mass and initial_Z as well as more exotic things like which nuclear net to use. After you've set up inlist, you can launch the code by using one of several little script files that are found in star/test: ./rn -- run an evolution using the current contents of inlist. Information about the state of the star is periodically written to the terminal (at a frequency determined by the 'log_cnt' control). The code also periodically saves "snapshots" of the internal state for possible restarts (the 'photostep' control determines how often this happens). For model numbers that are a multiple of 1000, the name of the snapshot is simply the model number. Otherwise, the name is 'x' followed by the last 3 digits of the model number. For example, a snapshot of model 1325 will be saved as x325. The snapshot files are saved in the 'photos' directory. (This naming scheme was created after I filled up my disc with snapshots during an overnight run -- now with photostep set to 10 or 20, I can let it run overnight without worrying about creating too many snapshots.) If you want to change some controls and restart from the snapshot in x325, do ./re x325 -- restart using snapshot in file photos/x325 Logs and profiles are written to the 'LOGS' directory in test (profiles are saved at a frequency determined by the 'profile_interval' control; a star log entry is created for each model). The files 'log1.data', 'log2.data', etc. have information about a particular model. The file 'profiles.index' has information about what's in those log files. Finally, 'star.log' has the history for the entire run of a variety of values. The LOGS information is automatically reset when you start a new evolution using ./rn, but it is not reset when you do a restart using ./re -- however it is okay to delete the entire contents of LOGS at any time during a run; it will automatically remake the files and keep going from there. You'll find that the profiles and logs are organized as columns of data with enough text info included to make it reasonably clear what's what. I use Tioga for plotting (it was created for this sort of thing), and the plot routines that I use for mesa/star can be found in star_history and star_profile. At this time, the documentation for mesa/star is limited to emails from me! So don't hesitate to ask. Just understand that things are still in a very preliminary state; I'm sure there are lots of bugs out there waiting to be found. ; - ) Cheers, Bill |
From: Frank T. <fx...@ma...> - 2008-05-04 18:33:20
|
hi bill, sure. fxt > Hi, > > Since mesa/eos returns both mu and free_e = 1/mu_e, and their > partials wrt T and rho, is it possible to remove the full ionization > assumption? > > --Bill |
From: Bill P. <pa...@ki...> - 2008-05-04 18:29:33
|
On May 4, 2008, at 11:20 AM, Ken Shen wrote: > Great! Just to clarify, for example, is h_dpd = dlnP/dlnrho, and is > h_dpdt = dln(dlnP/dlnrho)/dlnT? And are these log derivatives (as > opposed > to h_dpd = dP/drho)? The helm derivatives are not logs, so h_dpd = dP/drho = dP/dd ('d' for 'density') -Bill |
From: Bill P. <pa...@ki...> - 2008-05-04 18:13:23
|
The routine eos_get_everything returns all of the HELM results in addition to the usual mesa/eos results. In eos_def you'll find a long list of integer parameter definitions for the results from helm. The ones starting 'h_dp' are the derivatives of pressure, and 'h_dpda' is the partial wrt abar, 'h_dpdz' is the partical wrt zbar, etc. --Bill On May 4, 2008, at 11:06 AM, Ken Shen wrote: > That would definitely work, except I don't know how to access dP/d > (abar) > etc. Which function would I use? There is a dmu/dlnT in the more > complicated eos_get, but I'm not quite sure what that is... > > > Thanks, > Ken > > > > On Sun, 4 May 2008, Frank Timmes wrote: > >> hi ken, >> >> ok. assuming full ionization, >> >> mu_i = 1 /(sum Y_i) = Abar >> >> mu_e = 1 /(sum Y_i Z_i) = 1/Y_e >> >> mu = ( 1/mu_i + 1/mu_e )**(-1) = 1/(sum Y_i (Z_i + 1)) = Abar/ >> (Zbar + 1) >> >> d(mu) = dAbar/(Zbar + 1) + Abar/(Zbar + 1)**2 d(Zbar) >> >> the routines return derivatives with respect >> to composition like dP/d(Abar) and dP/d(Zbar). >> >> given the relation between mu, Abar and Zbar >> can you fill in the rest? >> >> fxt >> >> >> >>> I mean the mean mass per particle, like, 1/mu = 1/mu_i + 1/mu_e. >> >> >> > |
From: Bill P. <pa...@ki...> - 2008-05-04 18:10:11
|
Hi, Since mesa/eos returns both mu and free_e = 1/mu_e, and their partials wrt T and rho, is it possible to remove the full ionization assumption? --Bill BTW: I've copied this to mesa-users just to get in the habit of leaving a trace of such conservations that will undoubtedly come up again in the future. Please humor me on this and include mesa-users in your messages too. On May 4, 2008, at 11:02 AM, Frank Timmes wrote: > hi ken, > > ok. assuming full ionization, > > mu_i = 1 /(sum Y_i) = Abar > > mu_e = 1 /(sum Y_i Z_i) = 1/Y_e > > mu = ( 1/mu_i + 1/mu_e )**(-1) = 1/(sum Y_i (Z_i + 1)) = Abar/(Zbar > + 1) > > d(mu) = dAbar/(Zbar + 1) + Abar/(Zbar + 1)**2 d(Zbar) > > the routines return derivatives with respect > to composition like dP/d(Abar) and dP/d(Zbar). > > given the relation between mu, Abar and Zbar > can you fill in the rest? > > fxt > > > >> I mean the mean mass per particle, like, 1/mu = 1/mu_i + 1/mu_e. > > > |
From: Bill P. <pa...@ki...> - 2008-05-04 14:39:33
|
Hi Falk (and Didier), > On May 4, 2008, at 7:19 AM, Falk Herwig wrote: >> Bill, I am forwarding your request to Didier Saumon at Los Alamos. Thanks Falk -- that's an excellent idea! Didier, as you may recall, the mesa/eos is a blended combination of Frank Timmes' HELM for high T with OPAL and SCVH for lower T. The missing piece is the region that is below OPAL in temperature and below SCVH in density. I'm running models out to the photosphere (gray atmosphere, optical depth of 2/3), and with extremely low masses (0.02Msun in the example in my original email), and the surface of the model is extending into the missing region. Ideally we'd have a continuation of SCVH to much lower densities and/or a continuation of OPAL to much lower temperatures. I think the main deviation from ideal gas that comes into play is the H to H2 transition. I'm sure there are lots of other difficult things to deal with in a full solution, but neutral gas of atoms with H and H2 in transition would be a wonderful first step. Cheers, Bill |
From: Bill P. <pa...@ki...> - 2008-05-04 13:48:07
|
Hi Frank, Perhaps you can enlighten us on this one. Thanks, Bill Begin forwarded message: > From: Ken Shen <ke...@ph...> > Date: May 3, 2008 9:49:04 PM PDT > To: Bill Paxton <pa...@ki...> > Subject: dlnP/dlnMu ? > > Hi Bill. In the MESA EoS stuff, I know I can get dlnP/dlnRho at > constant > T, for example, by calling eos_get_basic_results. But is there an > easy > way to get dlnP/dlnMu at constant rho and T (i.e., chi_mu)? I'm > trying to > find it so that I can calculate the Brunt frequency for convection... > > > Thanks, > Ken > |
From: Bill P. <pa...@ki...> - 2007-05-14 16:15:45
|
On May 14, 2007, at 3:46 AM, astrophysics wrote: > Hello. > I have a problem with extracting con.f file from =20 > mesa_con-0.1.tar.gz package. > That file is probably corrupted. Could you verify it? > Thanks a lot. > Hello, That file seems to download okay for me -- strange.... Have you =20 been able to download other packages? In the meantime, I've attached the tar file and the source files for =20 mesa_con-0.1. =EF=BF=BC =EF=BF=BC=EF=BF=BC=EF=BF=BC Let me know how it goes.... BTW, your email doesn't include your name -- I'd enjoy knowing a bit =20 more such as who you are and what you'd like to do with mesa. I hope =20= you understand that mesa is still in early stages of development and =20 as a result is rather unstable. You are welcome to pick up packages =20 and use them however you like, but use them carefully and with a =20 degree of skepticism appropriate for "raw" code! Cheers, Bill Paxton |
From: astrophysics <ast...@o2...> - 2007-05-14 10:47:11
|
Hello. I have a problem with extracting con.f file from mesa_con-0.1.tar.gz = package. That file is probably corrupted. Could you verify it? Thanks a lot. |