Memcache error : Object synchronization method was called from an unsynchronized block of code

[Shikhar Maheshwari]

Hi,

I am continuously getting the error through the dotnet client "Object synchronization method was called from an unsynchronized block of code" when the load on the memcache server increases.

I have set the following default value for memcached connections:
SockIOPool pool = SockIOPool.GetInstance();
pool.SetServers(serverlist);

        pool.InitConnections = 20;
        pool.MinConnections = 20;
        pool.MaxConnections = maxConnections;

        pool.SocketConnectTimeout = 1000;
        pool.SocketTimeout = 3000;

        pool.MaintenanceSleep = 30;
        pool.Failover = true;

        pool.Nagle = false;
        pool.Initialize();

Am I missing something. Please help.

[Tim Gebhardt]

This library has kind of been abandoned. Have you looked into AppFabric
caching (formerly Velocity) if you're on the .NET stack? It's full
featured and supported by MSFT.

On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 9:21 AM, Shikhar Maheshwari <icoshikhar@users.sf.net

wrote:

Hi,

I am continuously getting the error through the dotnet client "Object
synchronization method was called from an unsynchronized block of code"
when the load on the memcache server increases.

I have set the following default value for memcached connections:
SockIOPool pool = SockIOPool.GetInstance();
pool.SetServers(serverlist);

    pool.InitConnections = 20;
    pool.MinConnections = 20;
    pool.MaxConnections = maxConnections;

    pool.SocketConnectTimeout = 1000;
    pool.SocketTimeout = 3000;

    pool.MaintenanceSleep = 30;
    pool.Failover = true;

    pool.Nagle = false;
    pool.Initialize();

Am I missing something. Please help.

Memcache error : Object synchronization method was called from an
unsynchronized block of codehttps://sourceforge.net/p/memcacheddotnet/discussion/508313/thread/210608b1/?limit=50#3edd

---

Sent from sourceforge.net because you indicated interest in
https://sourceforge.net/p/memcacheddotnet/discussion/508313/

To unsubscribe from further messages, please visit
https://sourceforge.net/auth/subscriptions/

[Shikhar Maheshwari]

Hi Tim,

Thanks for the reply.

Why does MemCached does not close the connection on it's own after the operation has been performed. What is the alternative client library that you would suggest for proper functioning - BeIT or Enyim or some other...

Requesting prompt response...

With Regards,

Shikhar

[Tim Gebhardt]

Hi Shikhar,

Sorry not to be of much help, but I haven't looked at this code base in a
very long time. For the .NET world you're probably better off using the
AppFabric cache that is more native and supported by MSFT for distributed
caching. Otherwise if you're not keen on that I know that the
StackOverflow team uses Redis for their caching scheme so that solution is
well supported by the community. I'm just not very familiar with the
projects you mentioned.

On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 5:41 AM, Shikhar Maheshwari <icoshikhar@users.sf.net

wrote:

Hi Tim,

Thanks for the reply.

Why does MemCached does not close the connection on it's own after the
operation has been performed. What is the alternative client library that
you would suggest for proper functioning - BeIT or Enyim or some other...

Requesting prompt response...

With Regards,

Shikhar

Memcache error : Object synchronization method was called from an
unsynchronized block of codehttps://sourceforge.net/p/memcacheddotnet/discussion/508313/thread/210608b1/?limit=50#3edd/bad6/ec43

---

Sent from sourceforge.net because you indicated interest in
https://sourceforge.net/p/memcacheddotnet/discussion/508313/

To unsubscribe from further messages, please visit
https://sourceforge.net/auth/subscriptions/