From: Matt R. <mre...@te...> - 2004-06-14 21:23:17
|
On Mon, 2004-06-14 at 14:06, David Mansfield wrote: > Hmm. You're right. There's something really funky going on. If you > look closely at the output of mdb-tables, or mdb-schema, there are some > 'unprintable' characters being generated as part of the table name for > some tables, including these. >=20 > So the table name is not being extracted correctly. That's probably a > bug somewhere... Possibly in the unicode string extraction or > something. >=20 > Let's see... Ok. It seems as though the 'hardcoded' max object name > length of 30 is screwing you up. If we hardcode it to 50 it works.=20 > (begs a different question but....). So try the attached patch on top > of the combined patch and it seems to work. >=20 > NOTE: the table names ARE case sensitive, so be sure to use mdb-tables > to get the exact name, then cut-and-paste for mdb-export. This works! Thank you. I'm now getting all the relevant data out of those tables. I did double-check the case-sensitivity. Any reason the tables are case sensitive? I thought MS didn't require that. Seems like it'd be "nice" to have :) Thank you again. --=20 Matt Reynolds <mre...@te...> |