Re: [mdb-dev] null_mask in row definition

[<br...@br...>]

I found out something with the position of the column in the
null_mask.  There is a field in the tdef page that determines the
order, and it's important for tables with deleted columns.  I'm just
about finished with my fixes for deleted columns, so I'm going to wrap
them up together and commit them.  Patch looks good though, and I
merged it into my tree this morning.

Stay tuned.

Brian

On Tue, 2 Mar 2004 22:05:33 -0800 (PST), Jeff Smith wrote:

> 
> FYI, I have submitted it to the patches page at sf.
> 
>  -- Jeff S (sf username: whydoubt)
> 
> --- br...@br... wrote:
> > Excellent! I'll add a note to the HACKING file about the order. 
The
> > mdb_crack_row() stuff is a fairly recent change, and not all of it
> may
> > have made it from the old data.c routine (although I hope it did). 
> > I'm working on this area myself at the moment trying to get
> > deleted/added columns working correctly.
> > 
> > Sorry about the Jet4 thing, been working on write support under
Jet3
> > primarily and haven't gotten to the point of translating that to
> > Jet4....doh!
> > 
> > I'll be looking forward to your patch.
> > 
> > Brian
> 
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Search - Find what you�re looking for faster
> http://search.yahoo.com
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now.
> Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with
> a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now!
> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click
> _______________________________________________
> mdbtools-dev mailing list
> mdb...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mdbtools-dev