From: Jeff S. <why...@ya...> - 2004-03-02 06:03:01
|
I was comparing mdb_pack_row and mdb_crack_row, and there seems to be a discrepancy in how they handle null_mask (as it is called in the HACKING document). In mdb_pack_row, it is encoded without respect to whether the field is fixed or variable. In mdb_crack_row, it treats the null_mask as if the fixed fields were encoded before the variable fields. Which is correct? I can easily fix the incorrect one if I know which one that is. :-) -- Jeff S __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Search - Find what youre looking for faster http://search.yahoo.com |