On Mon, 2004-06-14 at 14:06, David Mansfield wrote:
> Hmm. You're right. There's something really funky going on. If you
> look closely at the output of mdb-tables, or mdb-schema, there are some
> 'unprintable' characters being generated as part of the table name for
> some tables, including these.
>=20
> So the table name is not being extracted correctly. That's probably a
> bug somewhere... Possibly in the unicode string extraction or
> something.
>=20
> Let's see... Ok. It seems as though the 'hardcoded' max object name
> length of 30 is screwing you up. If we hardcode it to 50 it works.=20
> (begs a different question but....). So try the attached patch on top
> of the combined patch and it seems to work.
>=20
> NOTE: the table names ARE case sensitive, so be sure to use mdb-tables
> to get the exact name, then cut-and-paste for mdb-export.
This works! Thank you. I'm now getting all the relevant data out of
those tables.
I did double-check the case-sensitivity. Any reason the tables are case
sensitive? I thought MS didn't require that. Seems like it'd be "nice"
to have :)
Thank you again.
--=20
Matt Reynolds <mre...@te...>
|
