From: Michael K. <m-...@m-...> - 2017-02-02 21:32:13
|
Hi list, Am Wed, 1 Feb 2017 13:48:53 +0100 schrieb Markus Lauterbach <de...@ma...>: > On Wed, 1 Feb 2017 13:17:41 +0100 > Markus Lauterbach <de...@ma...> wrote: > > > On Tue, 31 Jan 2017 10:27:56 +0100 > > Michael Kress <m-...@m-...> wrote: > > > > > Hi list, > > > > > > this is a patch originally fixed by MBR: > > > If read() returns -1 and the errno says EAGAIN or EWOULDBLOCK, the > > > socket is not necessarily defective. > > > > > > > Looks good, but errno should only be checked > > if read returns -1 and not > > if read returns 0. Done. Please review the attached patch again. Thank you! -- Servus Michael |