Re: [Mca2-user] wrong links

[Herman B. <Her...@me...>]

On Fri, 7 Sep 2001, Jan Albiez wrote:

> On Fri, Sep 07, 2001 at 10:46:01AM +0200, Robert Schwebel wrote:
> > unfortunately I could not find any license information in the mca2
> > package. Could one of the developers tell me how it is licensed?
>
> As implied on the sf home page MCA comes with two license schemes (sorry,
> our license file got lost somehow and one of the responsible persons is on
> holiday right now, but we will fix this as soon as possible):
>
> * GPL:
>
> If you use MCA under the Terms of the GNU General Public license, you are
> allowed to modify and redistribute the code as you like as long as you keep
> to the GPL.
>
> * Proprietary:
>
> If you want to sell closed-source MCA bases software you have to buy
> a developer license from us.

Strange... The GPL allows selling commercial products with GPLed
software in it, so how can you enforce this?

Herman