Re: [Mc-mint-devel] mint bug

[Baris S. <si...@su...>]

On Thu, Mar 14, 2002 at 07:57:27PM +0300, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Mar 2002 09:27:33 -0600
> "Mike Bernico" <MBe...@Il...> wrote:
> 
> > Yeah, it probably is time for a new release... 
> 
> Wait a moment :)

okay, i am waiting for new release.

> I've done some cleanups, but can't commit on SF.
> Maybe my arms grow from the hmmm... not from the shoulders, but
> Permission denied always appears, when i enter my passwordd.
> 
> btw, Mike, since you anly the one(?), who can commit on SF, so can you
> delete network.c file, since it is copy of transmit.c, but network.c is
> not good name because of ipv{4,6}_net.c names. And also, config file
> parseing magically is not present on SF cvs, please add, without it mint
> can not be compiled. 

i dont have permission on SF file system. Mike must do all file operatings.

> > Is the changelog format ok for you Baris?  Les will be making redhat
> > packages packages someday also.  He will probably have the same
> > issues.

currently 09 version ChangeLog is not okay. Because it is not clear, i have to know who made these changes for each line. I never used CVS. i am using package on SF download page to package it. Format does not matter. if i know owners of changes it is okay for me.
  
> > What should the release number be?
> 
> 1 :)

The version syntax like X.Y is acceptable for packaging.

X is major number (for major changes)
Y is minor number (for minor changes)

i think we should use mint-X.Y.tar.gz for package file name. Not like mint.tar.gz. Just my offer.

> I plan to create shared lib this week.
> make libs -> libmint.so.
> It will contain send/recv functions, and control one.
> But maybe it will not born this week :)
>  
> > Mike
> 
> 	Evgeniy Polyakov ( s0mbre )

 i am waiting for it.

see you.