Re: [Maxlinux-devel] KDE 2.2.2?

[Michael L. <inc...@my...>]

Kelledin,

I'd just include KDE3, GNOMEx, and a bunch of Window Managers.  Also,
would it be possible to change the default background image of KDE &
GNOME to show our logo (Corel did this if I remember correctly), even
after you set up the basic desktop?  Hey, I have a package that I found
while reading a magazine, that we should include, it is called QUB and
can be found here:

http://qub.sf.net/

Michael




On Mon, 2 Sep 2002 09:29:39 -0500, "Kelledin"
<kel...@sk...> said:
> On Monday 02 September 2002 08:20 am, Terry Churchill wrote:
> > I'm not really a KDE user, but I assume that older KDE apps
> > look & work exactly the same way under both releases?
>=20
> Pretty much.  Some KDE apps need porting to work with KDE3, but=20
> generally they end up looking the same between KDE3 and KDE2. =20
> Even if they don't, I'll probably be compiling KDE-based apps=20
> against KDE3 whenever possible, rather than KDE2 (all in the=20
> name of progress).
>=20
> The appearance differences were much more pronounced between KDE1=20
> and KDE2 (plus, KDE2 was considerably more resource-hungry than=20
> KDE1).  Thus why distros like SuSE included both versions.
>=20
> --
> Kelledin
> "If a server crashes in a server farm and no one pings it, does=20
> it still cost four figures to fix?"
>=20
>=20
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old
> cell phone?  Get a new here for FREE!
> https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=3Dsourceforge1&refcode1=3Dvs3390
> _______________________________________________
> Maxlinux-devel mailing list
> Max...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/maxlinux-devel
>=20

--=20
http://fastmail.fm
 - Taking the "ail" out of email!=20