[Maxima-bugs] [maxima:bugs] Re: #4636 signum(ind) is an error

[Stavros M. <mac...@us...>]

I agree with Ray. I don't see what we gain by having signum(2.3)=>1.0. (I may have argued the opposite in the past...?)


---

**[bugs:#4636] signum(ind) is an error**

**Status:** open
**Group:** None
**Labels:** extended real signum limit 
**Created:** Thu Nov 27, 2025 12:41 PM UTC by Barton Willis
**Last Updated:** Sat Nov 29, 2025 12:21 AM UTC
**Owner:** nobody


Either a  `signum` nounform or `ind` is a better result than an error:
~~~
(%i4)	signum(ind);
sign: sign of ind is undefined.
~~~
Should the general simplifier, or the one‑argument limit function, handle` F(extended-real)`? We’ve discussed this—do we have a consensus?



---

Sent from sourceforge.net because max...@li... is subscribed to https://sourceforge.net/p/maxima/bugs/

To unsubscribe from further messages, a project admin can change settings at https://sourceforge.net/p/maxima/admin/bugs/options.  Or, if this is a mailing list, you can unsubscribe from the mailing list.