Re: [Maxima-discuss] operator precedence & display, was: Stop simplifying a subexpression

[Stavros M. <mac...@gm...>]

Sorry, I should have mentioned your fix for nounified =.
I was just (favorably) surprised that nounified +, *, and . already worked,
and = was the only exception.

I wonder why  *' "+"(a,b)* displays as *a+b *with *display2d:true* but as
*'mplus(a,b) *with *display2d:false*....

         -s

On Fri, Aug 15, 2025 at 11:59 PM Robert Dodier <rob...@gm...>
wrote:

> On Fri, Aug 15, 2025 at 10:45 AM Stavros Macrakis <mac...@gm...>
> wrote:
>
> > "="(a,b+1) => a = b + 1       << correct rendering with regular "="
> > ' "="(a,b+1) =>  a = (b + 1)   << BAD, parens are not necessary
>
> Try it again after
>
> :lisp (setf (get '%mequal 'rbp) (get 'mequal 'rbp))
> :lisp (setf (get '%mequal 'lbp) (get 'mequal 'lbp))
>
> which gives '"=" (nounified) the same binding powers as "=" (verbified).
>
> best
>
> Robert
>