From: Jaime V. <vi...@fe...> - 2024-11-28 14:08:52
|
On 28/11/24 11:55, Eduardo Ochs wrote: > I was expecting h(x)=0 for x<=0, and according to the plot > we got h(x)=x^2/2 for x<=0. What is going on? Hi, Yes, it is a bug in pwilt (and perhaps also exists in ilt?). The answers given by pwilt should include a factor hstep(x) which usually is perhaps has not been added assuming that the user is interested only in the domain x>=0. Regards, Jaime |