From: Stavros M. (Σ. Μ. <mac...@al...> - 2016-04-01 23:44:13
|
On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 7:26 PM, Robert Dodier <rob...@gm...> wrote: > On 2016-04-01, Stavros Macrakis <mac...@al...> wrote: > > > Tell me again, what would be the advantage of using Lisp complexes? > > Because it's there. <shrug> > > Oh, also one has complex numbers which > don't require rectform to get the obvious result. > Well, that's easily taken care of in a much simpler way! You raise lots of interesting questions, for which I mostly don't have > any answers. I'm just wondering why we would want to make it impossible > to work with Lisp complex numbers; it seems an unm > > athematical attitude. > I don't think mathematics says anything about how to use the features of a programming language to build a new abstraction. If Maxima were written in C, would you give users access to untyped pointers? (Hmm, scary to think that you might...) > But unless you or anybody actually arranges for Maxima to expel Lisp > complex numbers, I don't have any actual opposition. > > > best > > Robert Dodier > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Transform Data into Opportunity. > Accelerate data analysis in your applications with > Intel Data Analytics Acceleration Library. > Click to learn more. > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=278785471&iu=/4140 > _______________________________________________ > Maxima-discuss mailing list > Max...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/maxima-discuss > |