I changed %ex to %exp in two places in hayat.lisp. The testsuite showed no bugs or improvement.
First I thought the exp-form symbol property on %ex was simply a typo, but the %ex is
referenced one more time in the source.




From: Richard Fateman <fateman@berkeley.edu>
Sent: Wednesday, June 4, 2014 08:30
To: Barton Willis
Subject: Re: [Maxima-discuss] Taylor polynomial of ex

The same thing happens in commercial Macsyma.

It seems to be a taylor series only feature.  No properties
relating to evaluation or simplification are on $ex or %ex
except that the noun form of $ex is %ex.

On 6/4/2014 4:33 AM, Barton Willis wrote:


    (%i5) taylor('ex(x),x,0,3);
    (%o5)/T/ 1+x+x^2/2+x^3/6+...

    (%i6) :lisp(get '%ex 'exp-form)
    ((EXPEXP-FUNS 1 . 1) ((0 . 1) 1 . 1) (1 . 1) (1 . 1) (1 . 1))

Long ago was the Maxima name for the natural exponential function ex?


------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book "Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and their  applications. Written by three acclaimed leaders in the field,  this first edition is now available. Download your free book today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/NeoTech

_______________________________________________ Maxima-discuss mailing list Maxima-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/maxima-discuss