Menu

#3188 spherical_harmonic(n,m,x,y) incorrect

None
open
nobody
5
2024-06-03
2016-07-14
dan hayes
No

spherical_harmonic(n,m,x,y) incorrect
For example for spherical_harmonic(1,1,x,y) gives exactly the negative of the correct expression
as does also spherical_harmonic(2,1,x,y)

For example see many texts including Merzbacher :
page 248 equation (11.78) and the list (11.82) in
instrumentation.tamu.edu/~ting/other/QM_Merzbacher.pdf

Discussion

  • dan hayes

    dan hayes - 2016-07-17

    a test of trial runs indicated it is the wrong sign for m odd only. If so could correct it by multiplying by (-1)^m. Though have not done an exhaustive search.

     
  • David Billinghurst

    I agree that spherical_harmonic(n,m,x,y) differs in sign from Merzbacher for odd m, so that at least we have a documentation error. Apparently there are alternate normalizations of this function that differ by (-1)^m. (http://dlmf.nist.gov/14.30)
    .
    According to Arfen and Weber, Mathematical methods for physicists, 7th ed, (2015) section 15.5

    The definition we introduced for the associated Legendre functions leads to specific signs
    for the Y^m_l that are sometimes identified as the Condon-Shortley phase, after the authors
    of a classic text on atomic spectroscopy. This sign convention has been found to simplify
    various calculations, particularly in the quantum theory of angular momentum. One of
    the effects of this phase factor is to introduce an alternation of sign with m among the
    positive-m spherical harmonics.

    Affen and Weber gives Table 15.4 Spherical Harmonics (Condon-Shortley Phase) on p 760. At first glance this agrees with Merzbacher.

    We should check the conventions used by mathematica and maple.

     
  • Robert Dodier

    Robert Dodier - 2024-06-03
    • labels: --> orthopoly, spherical_harmonic
     

Log in to post a comment.