#2 Templated sites, Transfer Object commands



first we have to say: great work.

But we miss some things:
- How do we call template oriented websites that are build
via url path extensions (this is with asp.net working fine):
for example
sets ?

- How did your commands can be switched to
webServiced/.NET remoted/local commands ?? Our
customers are mixed with them !

- How do u plant in aspect oriented services like digest
authentication single sign on and so on ?

We think that a framework only for MVC is too much to
learn for the improvements ! ASP.NET is not J2EE !
- In ASP.NET you have a event based layer in J2EE u must
implement a MVC that is event based.
- In ASP.NET you have code behind that can do command
logik (we use code behind to get
ResponseTransferObject/RequestTransferObject that call
Business Facades to get Command logik (via WebService,
via .NET remoting or local)
- Why dispatch so hard if you could load xml dispatching
into DataSets (so u can visualize them and you can
update/insert new rules easily if you use xml-Schemas for
that) ?

You will see in practice that mvc overhead in a framework
will not be so useful like in j2ee cause most like event driven
systems are built in. You lose much flexibility with this
solution :-( MVC is not always classic or jsp model 2 MVC !

We developed in struts an barracude mvc's - that was nice
and hard :-) now we develop .NET frameworks that
developers can use things like CAPICOM, WSE and so on
in an MVC manner. But to built up a MVC system as a
single Framework does not only do the felxibility (today you
have to calculate the return on investment than to calculate
the flexibility !!!).

OK, but like we said: good work so far - hope we could give
you some other hints

Greetings from dotNetSol NY


  • Nobody/Anonymous

    Logged In: NO

    Sure, that is true. We have the same situation like you described
    here. MVC frameworks bring us more work than happyness
    in .NET. Our customers like a fast ROI :-)

    We implement MVC via code behind, events and TransferObjects
    with Business Facades like you described. That is very flaxible
    and fast to develop !

    Dr. Rem Beck - germany (IBM)

  • Nobody/Anonymous

    Logged In: NO

    What are you talking about is okey
    but when you start implementing it sooner or later you will get
    to something like maverick


Get latest updates about Open Source Projects, Conferences and News.

Sign up for the SourceForge newsletter:

No, thanks