|
From: Brett P. <bre...@gm...> - 2004-12-05 18:22:06
|
On Sun, 5 Dec 2004 10:11:16 +0100, Eric Pugh <ep...@up...> wrote: > I'm not a big fan of #1... That type of release made sense when > maven-plugins was brand new, and Maven didn't support downloading plugins > very well, or handle the rsync of plugins to Ibiblio. But now, that just > doesnt' flow with how Maven works. Not so much an issue of not being how Maven works. We could probably automate making an SF release in some way if that was desired. But I think it doesn't add the benefit, as you mention later. > I would rather see the plugins released via #1 removed, and the page hidden, > and stick to #2, which should programmaticllya lead to #3. I find using the > SF file release system slow and error prone, and doesn't add much. If it isn't being updated, probably best to remove them all. If you can somehow add a link that would send them to the downloads page - even better. Cheers, Brett |