Menu
▾
▴
maven-plugins-user
|
From: Jack <jac...@gm...> - 2007-12-17 09:14:16
|
Hi, I have a problem / question. In our larger projects we get a lot of "missing classes" messages even though these classes are either in the project themselves or included in the project. We are running Maven 1.1-beta-2, findbugs-plugin 1.4 and have both JDK 1.4 and JDK 1.5 projects. I have run findbugs with -Dfindbugs.debug.enable=true and the classes that it says are missing are definitely _not_ specified in the auxClasspath. Is there a solution to this problem, or a way to add to the auxClasspath? Cheers Jack... The claim "natural" is not synonymous with safe. |
|
From: Lukas T. <lth...@ap...> - 2007-12-17 09:33:19
|
Any reason for not trying Maven 1.1 final? :) There was a classloader bug in beta-2 ( http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MAVEN-1690 ) which is supposed to be fixed. That would be my first guess. If not we'd need more details about the problem. (And probably the main maven user list is a better place to ask...) HTH, -Lukas Jack wrote: > Hi, > > I have a problem / question. > > In our larger projects we get a lot of "missing classes" messages even > though these classes are either in the project themselves or included > in the project. > > We are running Maven 1.1-beta-2, findbugs-plugin 1.4 and have both > JDK 1.4 and JDK 1.5 projects. > > I have run findbugs with -Dfindbugs.debug.enable=true and the classes > that it says are missing are definitely _not_ specified in the > auxClasspath. > > Is there a solution to this problem, or a way to add to the auxClasspath? > > Cheers > Jack... > > The claim "natural" is not synonymous with safe. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > SF.Net email is sponsored by: > Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. > It's the best place to buy or sell services > for just about anything Open Source. > http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace > _______________________________________________ > Maven-plugins-user mailing list > Mav...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/maven-plugins-user > |
|
From: Jack <jac...@gm...> - 2007-12-17 09:58:47
|
Hi Lukas, we're not using Maven 1.1 as we built a lot of infrastructure around Maven 1.1-beta-2 way back when. We're not in a position at the moment to change this as Maven 1.1 final does not work for us. We have an ongoing migration to Maven 2 but that's still in the works. In the meantime we'd still like to QA our code using findbugs. I have to say here that findbugs does work partially, i.e. on all of the classes it can find it does the proper analysis and reporting, we'd just like to do it for the rest. What extra details would be helpful, I can provide findbugs debug output etc... Which one is the "main" maven users list? :) Cheers Jack... On 17/12/2007, Lukas Theussl <lth...@ap...> wrote: > Any reason for not trying Maven 1.1 final? :) There was a classloader > bug in beta-2 ( http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MAVEN-1690 ) which is > supposed to be fixed. That would be my first guess. If not we'd need > more details about the problem. (And probably the main maven user list > is a better place to ask...) > > HTH, > -Lukas |
|
From: Lukas T. <lth...@ap...> - 2007-12-17 10:33:44
|
Hi Jack, beta-2 is a very long way back, there was a beta-3 and a rc-1 release before 1.1-final, with lots of bug fixes in each. I don't think anyone is going to accept a bug report if you don't confirm first that it doesn't work with the latest stable release. Why does 1.1 not work for you? Personally, I consider beta-3 already way more usable and stable than beta-2. Can't you try to trim down your project just to confirm that 1.1 fixes this specific problem? You can find the official Maven mailing lists here: http://maven.apache.org/mail-lists.html Cheers, -Lukas Jack wrote: > Hi Lukas, > > we're not using Maven 1.1 as we built a lot of infrastructure around > Maven 1.1-beta-2 way back when. We're not in a position at the moment > to change this as Maven 1.1 final does not work for us. > We have an ongoing migration to Maven 2 but that's still in the works. > In the meantime we'd still like to QA our code using findbugs. > > I have to say here that findbugs does work partially, i.e. on all of > the classes it can find it does the proper analysis and reporting, > we'd just like to do it for the rest. > > What extra details would be helpful, I can provide findbugs debug output etc... > > Which one is the "main" maven users list? :) > > Cheers > Jack... > > On 17/12/2007, Lukas Theussl <lth...@ap...> wrote: > >>Any reason for not trying Maven 1.1 final? :) There was a classloader >>bug in beta-2 ( http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MAVEN-1690 ) which is >>supposed to be fixed. That would be my first guess. If not we'd need >>more details about the problem. (And probably the main maven user list >>is a better place to ask...) >> >>HTH, >>-Lukas > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > SF.Net email is sponsored by: > Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. > It's the best place to buy or sell services > for just about anything Open Source. > http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace > _______________________________________________ > Maven-plugins-user mailing list > Mav...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/maven-plugins-user > |
|
From: Jack <jac...@gm...> - 2007-12-17 15:49:41
|
Hi Lukas, ok I've had a play around with it, we can now compile and run findbugs with Maven 1.1, still the same missing classes issue (even though in this case the class is actually part of the same project). We have a lot of custom stuff to deploy to various servers etc... that we normally run, but that doesn't need to happen for a compile and findbugs so I've been able to skip that. Which data would be helpful then to see what is causing the problem? Cheers Jack... On 17/12/2007, Lukas Theussl <lth...@ap...> wrote: > Hi Jack, > > beta-2 is a very long way back, there was a beta-3 and a rc-1 release > before 1.1-final, with lots of bug fixes in each. I don't think anyone > is going to accept a bug report if you don't confirm first that it > doesn't work with the latest stable release. > > Why does 1.1 not work for you? Personally, I consider beta-3 already way > more usable and stable than beta-2. Can't you try to trim down your > project just to confirm that 1.1 fixes this specific problem? > > You can find the official Maven mailing lists here: > http://maven.apache.org/mail-lists.html > > Cheers, > -Lukas > > > Jack wrote: > > Hi Lukas, > > > > we're not using Maven 1.1 as we built a lot of infrastructure around > > Maven 1.1-beta-2 way back when. We're not in a position at the moment > > to change this as Maven 1.1 final does not work for us. > > We have an ongoing migration to Maven 2 but that's still in the works. > > In the meantime we'd still like to QA our code using findbugs. > > > > I have to say here that findbugs does work partially, i.e. on all of > > the classes it can find it does the proper analysis and reporting, > > we'd just like to do it for the rest. > > > > What extra details would be helpful, I can provide findbugs debug output etc... > > > > Which one is the "main" maven users list? :) > > > > Cheers > > Jack... > > > > On 17/12/2007, Lukas Theussl <lth...@ap...> wrote: > > > >>Any reason for not trying Maven 1.1 final? :) There was a classloader > >>bug in beta-2 ( http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MAVEN-1690 ) which is > >>supposed to be fixed. That would be my first guess. If not we'd need > >>more details about the problem. (And probably the main maven user list > >>is a better place to ask...) > >> > >>HTH, > >>-Lukas > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > SF.Net email is sponsored by: > > Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. > > It's the best place to buy or sell services > > for just about anything Open Source. > > http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace > > _______________________________________________ > > Maven-plugins-user mailing list > > Mav...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/maven-plugins-user > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > SF.Net email is sponsored by: > Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. > It's the best place to buy or sell services > for just about anything Open Source. > http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace > _______________________________________________ > Maven-plugins-user mailing list > Mav...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/maven-plugins-user > -- Cheers Jack... The claim "natural" is not synonymous with safe. |
Thanks for helping keep SourceForge clean.
X