|
From: Jae-Joon L. <lee...@gm...> - 2010-01-21 21:43:25
|
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 4:13 PM, Kurt Forrester <kur...@ho...> wrote: > Just to add one more query to the thread, do you consider a point on a > vertex of the axes to be a candidate for annotation without clipping? That > is to say if there is a point (0,0) I wish to annotate, and the origin of > the axes contains that point (0,0), would you (by design) want to be able to > annotate that point? My initial uncertainty as to why I need to have the > clipping turned to False in the first instance is because I thought that if > a point may fall on a any of the vertices they still should be considered > in the visible field. > I would agree with you. However, the current behavior inherits from how "inside test" is done for paths in general (point_in_path_impl in src/_path.cpp). So there is not much thing I can help. We may check if the point is "on" the path addiitionally, but I'm not sure if there is a relevant routine (while there is point_on_path, but I'm not sure if this is it). I'll try to take a further look later. Regards, -JJ |