From: <ma...@ll...> - 2002-07-26 15:06:39
|
Ray, I may have spoken too soon. Yes, the SEGMENT violation is gone. However, I stumbled upon this. I define three distinct vectors *WS*, *WD*, and D. Then I compute the following (dot *ws* d): 5.771771444577276d0 (dot *wd* d): #C(0.0d0 -8.946814341083627d0) (/ (m:dot *wd* d) (m:dot *ws* d)): #C(1.0d0 0.0d0) ==> THIS SHOULD HAVE BEEN #C(0.0D0 -1.5500985142939754D0) <== Now what? I'm clueless on how to track this one down. mike ;;; Here is the test file I used... (defparameter *ws* (m:make-complex-matrix '( 0.1950 0.2268 0.3161 0.4467 0.5964 0.7425 0.8661 0.9544 1.000 1.000 0.9544 0.8661 0.7425 0.5964 0.4467 0.3161 0.2268 0.1950))) (defparameter *wd* (m:make-complex-matrix '( 0.2316 0.3783 0.6041 0.8240 0.9720 1.000 0.8755 0.5988 0.2126 -0.2126 -0.5988 -0.8755 -1.000 -0.9720 -0.8240 -0.6041 -0.3783 -0.2316 ))) (defparameter d (m:make-complex-matrix '( #C( -6.8643E-1 -7.2719E-1) #C( -4.6423E-1 -8.8572E-1) #C( -2.0744E-1 -9.7825E-1) #C( 6.4808E-2 -9.9790E-1) #C( 3.3222E-1 -9.4320E-1) #C( 5.7489E-1 -8.1823E-1) #C( 7.7472E-1 -6.3230E-1) #C( 9.1684E-1 -3.9926E-1) #C( 9.9064E-1 -1.3648E-1) #C( 9.9064E-1 1.3648E-1) #C( 9.1684E-1 3.9926E-1) #C( 7.7472E-1 6.3230E-1) #C( 5.7489E-1 8.1823E-1) #C( 3.3222E-1 9.4320E-1) #C( 6.4808E-2 9.9790E-1) #C( -2.0744E-1 9.7825E-1) #C( -4.6423E-1 8.8572E-1) #C( -6.8643E-1 7.2719E-1)))) (format t "(dot ws d): ~A~%" (m:dot *ws* d)) (format t "(dot wd d): ~A~%" (m:dot *wd* d)) (format t "(/ (m:dot *wd* d) (m:dot *ws* d)): ~A~%" (/ (m:dot *wd* d) (m:dot *ws* d))) |