|
From: Raymond T. <to...@rt...> - 2002-06-21 18:28:27
|
>>>>> "Michael" == Michael A Koerber <ma...@ll...> writes:
>> Instead of an array, I've decided to just do (push x seq) and then
>> (nreverse seq) at the end. This is quite fast for me.
Michael> Ray,
Michael> Yes...this worked faster for me is well. I've included it, w/ obvious mods,
Michael> in my local working src copy.
Michael> tnx for the quick response
Thank you for finding the bug, and testing out a new solution!
I'd check it into CVS but I can't seem to access it today.
Sourceforge problems, I guess.
I'll do it soon.
Ray
|