From: Raymond T. <to...@rt...> - 2002-06-21 18:28:27
|
>>>>> "Michael" == Michael A Koerber <ma...@ll...> writes: >> Instead of an array, I've decided to just do (push x seq) and then >> (nreverse seq) at the end. This is quite fast for me. Michael> Ray, Michael> Yes...this worked faster for me is well. I've included it, w/ obvious mods, Michael> in my local working src copy. Michael> tnx for the quick response Thank you for finding the bug, and testing out a new solution! I'd check it into CVS but I can't seem to access it today. Sourceforge problems, I guess. I'll do it soon. Ray |