Re: [Matlisp-users] Question wrt interface to Allegro

[Raymond T. <ray...@er...>]

>>>>> "AJ" == A J Rossini <A.J.> writes:

    AJ> My "right answer" to the "wrong question" (that you didn't ask).
    AJ> If you don't mind the potential overhead of CFFI, take a look at the
    AJ> cl-blapack (works, for BLAS and LAPACK) and/or lisp-matrix packages
    AJ> (concepts and code) for Fortran linking with CFFI.

On my list of things to do is replacing the existing FFI in matlisp
with a new version that calls CFFI instead.

And, I think, for the the existing supported Lisps, CFFI has no
additional overhead.  And then matlisp will be automagically support
more lisps than sbcl, cmucl, and Allegro.

I can't really debug the Allegro issue since I don't have Allegro.
Will the free Allegro version compile enough of matlisp for me to test
it?

Ray