Re: [Matlisp-users] (MAKE-COMPLEX-MATRIX ...) SIGSEGV Problem

[Michael A. K. <ma...@ll...>]

I forgot I even reported this :-)

AFAIK CMUCL works fine for other things.  But I haven't "stressed" it
too much.  Once I got the SIGV I was dead in my tracks since this
"locks out" several years of code that I have developed.

I'm pushing to get permission to use FreeBSD since the OSs offered
to me for my use are "feature-starved".  If that fails, I may need
to find a solution to the SEGV problem.

mike


At Wed, 07 Jun 2006 09:18:41 -0400,
Raymond Toy <ray...@er...> wrote:
> 
> >>>>> "Michael" == Michael A Koerber <ma...@ll...> writes:
> 
>     Michael> All,
>     Michael>   I'm using "matlisp-2.0beta-2003-10-14.tar.gz" with CMUCL 19B.  Under
>     Michael> FreeBSD 5.4 and 6.0 all is well.
> 
>     Michael>   Under SUSE (SLES-9) and Red Hat Enterprise Linux WS, Version 3 I get
>     Michael> segment violation (see below).  (A long time ago I believe I saw
>     Michael> something like this that was attributed to shared object library
>     Michael> offsets changing.)  
> 
>     Michael>   Has this been noted before...is there a fix?
> 
> Sorry for the long delay.  I have Suse 9.0 but don't have a compatible
> f77 compiler to test matlisp with.  (Suse 9.3 and later won't install
> on my machine either because it can't boot from any of the install
> CDs.  Fooey.)
> 
> I don't have any problem with matlisp (CVS) with Solaris.
> 
> Does cmucl work ok for other things besides matlisp?
> 
> Ray
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Matlisp-users mailing list
> Mat...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matlisp-users
>