From: Raymond T. <ray...@er...> - 2005-12-05 18:08:35
|
>>>>> "Nicolas" == Nicolas Neuss <Nic...@iw...> writes: Nicolas> Yes, I did consider a unification. I have tried to keep classes and Nicolas> methods very close, so that this should even be relatively easy. Nicolas> On the other hand, the libraries have different purposes. The FL.MATLISP Nicolas> tries to provide only basic operations avoiding all hassle with external Nicolas> libraries, while Matlisp strives to achieve all the functionality (and Nicolas> performance) of LAPACK. I would be happy to incorporate any or all of these things into matlisp, if you are willing to donate them and if they seem appropriate. Since I don't use matlisp at all and since Tunc doesn't seem to be using matlisp anymore either, what happens in matlisp really, really depends on the users now. I'm willing to add functionality, but the users need to describe what they want. Ray |