|
From: Raymond T. <ray...@er...> - 2005-12-05 18:08:35
|
>>>>> "Nicolas" == Nicolas Neuss <Nic...@iw...> writes:
Nicolas> Yes, I did consider a unification. I have tried to keep classes and
Nicolas> methods very close, so that this should even be relatively easy.
Nicolas> On the other hand, the libraries have different purposes. The FL.MATLISP
Nicolas> tries to provide only basic operations avoiding all hassle with external
Nicolas> libraries, while Matlisp strives to achieve all the functionality (and
Nicolas> performance) of LAPACK.
I would be happy to incorporate any or all of these things into
matlisp, if you are willing to donate them and if they seem
appropriate.
Since I don't use matlisp at all and since Tunc doesn't seem to be
using matlisp anymore either, what happens in matlisp really, really
depends on the users now. I'm willing to add functionality, but the
users need to describe what they want.
Ray
|