[Matlisp-users] Re: Problem with function geev

[Thibault L. <tl...@di...>]

On Wed, 2005-08-10 at 09:32 -0400, Raymond Toy wrote:
> Paul Ledbetter III wrote:
> > I would like to know if the patch at the bottom of this email solves
> > the geev problem for the other people who have reported it.  It solves
> > mine.
> [snip]
> > The logical effect of this patch is to cause the LAPACK routines to
> > assume the base of the machine is at least binary.
> > 
> 
> Ah, thanks for digging into this.  A little googling finds the LAPACK 
> FAQ (http://www.netlib.org/lapack/faq.html) which indicates that dlamch 
> (and its dependent routines dlamc[1-5]) should be compiled without 
> optimization?  Can you compile dlamch.f by hand without optimization and 
> see if that makes a difference for you?
> 
> I'd really appreciate if you could, since I don't seem to have this 
> problem on my linux boxes.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Ray

Bingo ! It works.

After "make" I did

g77 -g -o LAPACK/SRC/dlamch.o -c LAPACK/SRC/dlamch.f

then make again and it worked.

Thibault