From: Raymond T. <rt...@ea...> - 2005-08-10 13:36:24
|
Paul Ledbetter III wrote: > I would like to know if the patch at the bottom of this email solves > the geev problem for the other people who have reported it. It solves > mine. [snip] > The logical effect of this patch is to cause the LAPACK routines to > assume the base of the machine is at least binary. > Ah, thanks for digging into this. A little googling finds the LAPACK FAQ (http://www.netlib.org/lapack/faq.html) which indicates that dlamch (and its dependent routines dlamc[1-5]) should be compiled without optimization? Can you compile dlamch.f by hand without optimization and see if that makes a difference for you? I'd really appreciate if you could, since I don't seem to have this problem on my linux boxes. Thanks! Ray |