Re: [Matlisp-users] Configuration failure on Linux/SBCL

[Raymond T. <to...@rt...>]

>>>>> "Robbie" == Robbie Sedgewick <rd...@me...> writes:

    Robbie> Either way, I think it would be nice to remove the matlisp's build
    Robbie> dependence on make (to make libmatlisp.so) and replace it with a more
    Robbie> sophisticated mk:defsystem or asdf system definition.  But that is
    Robbie> project for another day.

I had a defsystem definition that could compile all code in matlisp,
including the Fortran code.  This was easy.  The hard part is figuring
out the calling conventions and naming conventions of the Fortran
compiler, which is what configure is used for.  (We don't currently
check the calling conventions, I think, but we should.)

Ray