Re: [Matlisp-users] Configuration failure on Linux/SBCL

[Nicolas N. <Nic...@iw...>]

si...@EE... writes:

> I'll update the website.  So AFAIK, the current situation is:
> 
> Windows 2000, XP:  Allegro 6.0, 6.1, 6.2 based on libmatlisp.dll
>            which is compiled from the fortran sources using MinGW.
> 
> Solaris ??:  CMU CL v??,  Allegro 6.0, 6.1, 6.2 based on libmatlisp.so
>            which is compiled from the fortran sources using gcc and g77.
>            It is also possible to link in Atlas.
> 
> Linux:  CMU CL v??, SBCL v?? based on libmatlisp.so
>            which is compiled from the fortran sources using gcc and g77.
>            Is it possible to link in Atlas??

I use Matlisp/CMUCL on Debian with Atlas (no problem at all, and impressive
performance gains for GEMM and GETRF for larger matrices).  However, I have
not tried the CVS version of Matlisp yet.

Out of curiosity: is using Atlas possible with Windows?

Nicolas.