Re: [Matlisp-users] Matlisp subset in pure CL

[Nicolas N. <Nic...@iw...>]

Raymond Toy <to...@rt...> writes:

>     simsek> Having said that, matlisp has evolved along the way, with contributions
>     simsek> from select individuals like yourself.  I think it may be time to
>     simsek> consider more drastic functionality of the kind you're suggesting.
> 
> I also think this is a good idea.  It would be nice if this approach
> could be made seamless with Matlisp, so the user wouldn't have to know
> unless he wanted to.  If it also means changing some Matlisp
> functions, that would also be ok.  We might want to ask other users
> about that, though. :-)
> 
> We probably also want to do an official 2.0 release before adding such
> features for the "3.0" release.
> 
>     simsek> I, unfortunately, personally would not be able to participate in the development
>     simsek> but I think there are people out there who might be.
> 
> I can help some, but I don't use matlisp that much anymore.
> 
> Ray

When my sparse matrix code works, and the BLAS code generation has evolved
to a satisfactory state, I'll come back on this...

Yours, Nicolas.