From: Nicolas N. <Nic...@iw...> - 2003-11-24 18:20:39
|
si...@EE... writes: > Here are the numbers on my ACL6.1/WinXP system: These are the culprits: > DDOT-short: 89.36 MFLOPS > BLAS-DDOT-short: 34.01 MFLOPS > DAXPY-short: 75.32 MFLOPS > BLAS-DAXPY-short: 31.33 MFLOPS It means that calling the BLAS code results in 2-3 times slower code than using the Lisp functions. MFLOPS=10^6 FLOP/second. (Maybe I should have written it as MFLOP/s?) Interestingly this means that ACL has essentially the same problem as CMUCL. > and for reference here was the original figures you posted: > > > DDOT-long: 271.15 MFLOPS > DDOT-short: 679.58 MFLOPS > DAXPY-long: 143.55 MFLOPS > DAXPY-short: 488.06 MFLOPS > > BLAS-DDOT-long: 267.10 MFLOPS > BLAS-DDOT-short: 63.31 MFLOPS > BLAS-DAXPY-long: 149.13 MFLOPS > BLAS-DAXPY-short: 61.01 MFLOPS Thinking about a new computer? :-) But I admit that my personal laptop is not much faster than yours... Nicolas. |