Re: [Matlisp-users] Snapshot/Release?

[Raymond T. <to...@rt...>]

>>>>> "Marco" == Marco Antoniotti <ma...@cs...> writes:

    Marco> I'd go even further than that.  I think that M+, M* etc etc have no
    Marco> business in being exported/defined the way they are.  MATLISP:+,
    Marco> MATLISP:* etc etc are what you want.

I think M+ and friends are fine because they're methods that take 2
args.  If matlisp:+ were used instead, it would break peoples'
expectation of being able to give multiple arguments.

Adding such a macro to matlisp would be fine with me, but then we'd
get more complaints about this in addition to REAL. :-)

Ray