From: Raymond T. <to...@rt...> - 2003-02-04 16:29:01
|
>>>>> "mak" == mak <ma...@ll...> writes: mak> Okay...so I embarrass myself again...I didn't thoroughly check out the vector mak> case, since I was concertrating on the 2D case. The requires another modification mak> to fft.lisp. The below DIFF against fft.lisp should be the right one. mak> sorry We should be the ones apologizing! Patch applied. I'll commit soon. Testing with ACL needed, still. Ray P.S. Were you going to send some pseudo inverse code too? |