From: Eric L. <Eri...@ma...> - 2016-02-02 18:42:02
|
Thanks for the offer Uwe, help would be great. I have not moved from CVS to git because: 1) I'm only vaguely familiar with git, and not at all w/ mercurial 2) the matlab-emacs project is in maintenance mode, and doesn't seem to need the richness of a DVCS at this time. 3) Lazy. If there was some compelling development going on that needed a DVCS then I think it would be worth considering a migration. Is CVS just a non-starter for you, or is hg just more fun? Eric -----Original Message----- From: Uwe Brauer [mailto:ou...@ma...] Sent: Saturday, January 30, 2016 12:32 PM To: Eric Ludlam <Eri...@ma...> Cc: Uwe Brauer <ou...@ma...>; Torben Knudsen <tk...@es...>; matlab-emacs <mat...@li...> Subject: Re: [Matlab-emacs-discuss] execute matlab in a different directory. GNU vs Xemacs >>> "Eric" == Eric Ludlam <Eri...@ma...> writes: > I have some pending patches I haven't gotten around to pushing up into > CVS. I don't like pushing patches without checking the results myself, > and things have been busy lately. > I could definitely use help for this sort of thing. > Eric Hi I would not mind to volunteer, but CVS? Couldn't we convert it to a more modern system, git or mercurial? I propose the later, because - I am acquainted with HG, I also use bitbucket which would be a natural site then. - I have successfully converted various CVS/RCS repos to mercurial but don't know how to do this for git. Tell me what you think. Uwe |