Re: [Matlab-emacs-discuss] Problem Configuring matlab-mode with CEDET+matlab-shell+ECB+mlint

[Xiaoyu W. <wx...@gm...>]

Thank you very much Eric for the thorough and helpful explanation!

Jacob

On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 3:56 AM, Eric Ludlam <Eri...@ma...>
wrote:

>  ECB will try to use ‘imenu’ to show tags in the list of tags buffer if
> the CEDET/Semantic tools aren’t installed/on by default.   The imenu
> version as far as I remember only shows the names, not the prototype
> information.
>
>
>
> You will need to follow the readme on getting the CEDET tools installed to
> get that extra data available in ECB.   That is the same feature set that
> gets the dividing lines over functions to draw.   When you enable those
> tools you will have a bunch of other random options you will need to decide
> if you want enabled.  For example `semantic-decoration-mode’ draws the
> lines over functions.
>
>
>
> As long as there is still an ‘mlint’ executable with your MATLAB, you
> should be ok.   I looked at checkcode briefly, and it looks like it isn’t a
> standalone program, so I don’t have a good way to query it at this time.
>
>
>
> Eric
>
>
>
> *From:* Xiaoyu Wei [mailto:wx...@gm...]
> *Sent:* Thursday, January 15, 2015 9:10 PM
> *To:* mat...@li...
> *Subject:* [Matlab-emacs-discuss] Problem Configuring matlab-mode with
> CEDET+matlab-shell+ECB+mlint
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> It may not be the proper question to ask here. But basically I am trying
> to get my environment set up like this:
>
>
> http://blogs.mathworks.com/images/desktop/eric_ludlam_matlab_and_emacs/matlab-ecb.jpg
>
> Somehow I got everything to work, except for two things:
>
>  1. In W-2 frame, I can't see full declaration of functions. Instead, I
> get simply "func" for "function func ( x, y) ", and what's worse, "p" for
> "function p=func( x, y )".
>
>  2. I can't get the lines dividing functions (as shown in the picture
> above).
>
> Do you guys have any ideas how I can fix these?
>
> In addition, according to
> http://www.mathworks.com/help/matlab/ref/mlint.html, mlint is not
> recommended and it is suggested to use checkcode instead. Will this be a
> problem?
>
> Thanks in advance!
>
> Jacob
>