From: Michael 'h. K. <mai...@zz...> - 2004-08-23 10:19:45
|
On Mon, Aug 23, 2004 at 09:25:53AM +0200, Tomas Pospisek wrote: > On Fri, 20 Aug 2004, Michael 'hacker' Krelin wrote: > > > Oops, while I was going to submit ebuild, I found out that it is already > > submitted, but not in the distribution, yet. > > > > http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53469 > > > > Strangely enough, there are gcc 3.4 patches. Isn't the latest release > > gcc3.4 enabled? > > Ouhm - the patch consists in replacing all the c-client.h includes with > c-client-wrapper.h. Maybe the person who submitted this was using a > pre-5.2.1 release as a base and added the c-client-wrapper after? > > I'm Bcc:-ing the person, so maybe he'll comment. (Bcc: since maybe he > doesn't want to get involved) Yes... It's a 5.1.2 based. I overlooked similar-looking numbers :) > > The ebuild proposed there also makes use of krb,ssl, etc. options. Would > > you people using it with options and without tell me if these are really > > mailsync features or mailsync depends on the c-client configuration and > > we just have to figure out options to make it compile? > > It's the later. Yes, I checked that already through the autoconf script. > > Anyway, Tomas, I think you may wish to take a look at the ebuild. I > > liked mine better -- it's short :) > > ;-). I guess the gentoo people get to decide :-). True. Anyway, the latest comment on the bug page is mine and I've attached my ebuild. I think the rest is up to gentoo people. Love, H |