|
From: <li...@av...> - 2003-07-09 16:03:14
|
> Can our current DB schema handle this? > > I *think* it can -- it seems like we're using message ID + the unique > integer (msg_ids.m_id). Does that make sense? We're keying everything by our own internal identifier - msg_ids.m_id, which then gets referenced in the other tables (msg_attach, etc.). The message ID itself is in msg_ids.m_msg_id, so presumably if we get a second copy of the same message (forwarded, whatever) we could drop it or keep it, depending on what you want to do. - Liza |