From: <pi...@de...> - 2005-04-05 13:58:17
|
From: "Nicholas Hardy" <nic...@er...> > Maybe we could do better by trying to port BetaPlayer You don't have to. It's already underway :) > I haven't done any real performance testing yet, so I haven't observed where > the time is being spent. The video display is extra inefficient in that it's > actually currently doing YUV->RGB24->RGB16. > > You wouldn't happen to have some nice ARM assembly I could just drop in lying > around or anything like that? :) It's kinda integrated into BetaPlayer. It's not just separate assembly file, I uses dynamically generated ARM code. > I agree about moving to pure ARM code. As I've gone, I've tried to make sure > I made few assumptions about the processor type in most of the code (where I > didn't have to). I probably couldn't have started off with doing pure-arm, > but I'm a bit more familiar with the tools now so I'll probably make the move > as the next major stage of development. Btw what do you know about prc-tools development? It seems the latest 2.3 version is very old. I'am currently compiling new modified gcc cross compiler for myself using gcc 3.4.3 with making the R9 ARM register free for use (and restoring it manually before every OS callback). Loosing two ARM registers (R9,R10) with the default armlet system on PalmOS is kinda too much for me :) bye, Picard |