Re: [Madwifi-devel] ar5k and Atheros AR5005G

[Michael R. <ma...@no...>]

Hi.

Michael Buesch wrote:
>> IIRC Pavel already explained that getting rid of the HAL per se should be
>> no problem - it could easily be dissolved into the driver, if that is one
>> of the requirements to be fulfilled before the driver (MadWifi or DadWifi)
>> is considered for mainline inclusion. As soon as there is source available
>> to dissolve, at least.
> Ok, so who actually does the work?

The MadWifi team? It won't happen today or tomorrow, but I'm confident 
that it will happen. Any contribution to that effort is highly welcome - 
the more people help, the faster will the goal be reached.

>> From what I understood the "... once the hal issue is resolved" part of
>> David's mail refered to exactly that question.
> Ok, I don't know what "The HAL Issue" (tm) is.

You referred to the archives where that exact "issue"(s) (binary-only, 
non-free, no sources, unwanted level of abstraction) has/have been 
discussed in lenght, but you claim you didn't have a clue what David was 
talking about? Come on.

Bye, Mike