Thread: [Madwifi-users] athstats help?
Status: Beta
Brought to you by:
otaku
From: Gene <gen...@gm...> - 2012-06-14 18:22:25
|
The documented athstats arguments do not seem to work for me. I can not get a n-second "progressive rolling report." Running athstats with any arguments just returns the one-time "summary report." For example: XM.v5.3.5.# athstats 42 recv overrun interrupts 54 recv eol interrupts ... 3.91 tx aggregate subframe retry percent 0.00 tx aggregate subframe excessive retry percent XM.v5.3.5.# athstats 5 42 recv overrun interrupts 54 recv eol interrupts ... 3.91 tx aggregate subframe retry percent 0.00 tx aggregate subframe excessive retry percent XM.v5.3.5.# athstats -i wifi0 5 42 recv overrun interrupts 54 recv eol interrupts ... 3.91 tx aggregate subframe retry percent 0.00 tx aggregate subframe excessive retry percent What am I missing? Is there a configuration to set that allows the "progressive" report? I am not a c programmer but the code at http://madwifi-project.org/log/madwi...ols/athstats.c appears to handle reporting when given an interval argument. Help? Thanks, Gene Boggs Software Engineer |
From: Pavel R. <pr...@gn...> - 2012-06-14 23:02:49
|
On Thu, 14 Jun 2012 11:21:52 -0700 Gene <gen...@gm...> wrote: > The documented athstats arguments do not seem to work for me. I can > not get a n-second "progressive rolling report." Running athstats with > any arguments just returns the one-time "summary report." For example: > > XM.v5.3.5.# athstats > 42 recv overrun interrupts > 54 recv eol interrupts > ... > 3.91 tx aggregate subframe retry percent > 0.00 tx aggregate subframe excessive retry percent > > XM.v5.3.5.# athstats 5 > 42 recv overrun interrupts > 54 recv eol interrupts > ... > 3.91 tx aggregate subframe retry percent > 0.00 tx aggregate subframe excessive retry percent > > XM.v5.3.5.# athstats -i wifi0 5 I'm getting "progressive rolling report" when running this command. > What am I missing? Is there a configuration to set that allows the > "progressive" report? > > I am not a c programmer but the code at > http://madwifi-project.org/log/madwi...ols/athstats.c appears to > handle reporting when given an interval argument. Make sure you are using a version of athstat that was compiled from the right source. When reporting problems in any software, please always report the version of the software. -- Regards, Pavel Roskin |
From: Gene <gen...@gm...> - 2012-06-15 18:52:31
|
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 3:27 PM, Pavel Roskin <pr...@gn...> wrote: > On Thu, 14 Jun 2012 11:21:52 -0700 Gene <gen...@gm...> wrote: > >> The documented athstats arguments do not seem to work for me. I can >> not get a n-second "progressive rolling report." Running athstats with >> any arguments just returns the one-time "summary report." For example: >> >> ... >> XM.v5.3.5.# athstats -i wifi0 5 > When reporting problems in any software, please always report the > version of the software. Hi Pavel, The AirOS software version number is given in the device prompt in my post (XM.v5.3.5). Cheers, Gene |
From: Pavel R. <pr...@gn...> - 2012-06-15 20:28:33
|
Quoting Gene <gen...@gm...>: > On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 3:27 PM, Pavel Roskin <pr...@gn...> wrote: >> On Thu, 14 Jun 2012 11:21:52 -0700 Gene <gen...@gm...> wrote: >> >>> The documented athstats arguments do not seem to work for me. I can >>> not get a n-second "progressive rolling report." Running athstats with >>> any arguments just returns the one-time "summary report." For example: >>> >>> ... >>> XM.v5.3.5.# athstats -i wifi0 5 > >> When reporting problems in any software, please always report the >> version of the software. > > Hi Pavel, > > The AirOS software version number is given in the device prompt in my > post (XM.v5.3.5). If you are reporting a problem to a MadWifi mailing list, it would be natural to report the version of MadWifi, not of the distro. I guess you need to talk to your software vendor about this problem. I don't think anybody here can help you with a version of MadWifi packaged by someone else and stripped of a version number. -- Regards, Pavel Roskin |
From: Gene <gen...@gm...> - 2012-06-15 21:17:26
|
Ah yes. I mistook the AirOS distro for madwifi itself. On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 1:28 PM, Pavel Roskin <pr...@gn...> wrote: > Quoting Gene <gen...@gm...>: > >> On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 3:27 PM, Pavel Roskin <pr...@gn...> wrote: >>> >>> On Thu, 14 Jun 2012 11:21:52 -0700 Gene <gen...@gm...> wrote: >>> >>>> The documented athstats arguments do not seem to work for me. I can >>>> not get a n-second "progressive rolling report." Running athstats with >>>> any arguments just returns the one-time "summary report." For example: >>>> >>>> ... >>>> XM.v5.3.5.# athstats -i wifi0 5 >> >> >>> When reporting problems in any software, please always report the >>> version of the software. >> >> >> Hi Pavel, >> >> The AirOS software version number is given in the device prompt in my >> post (XM.v5.3.5). > > > If you are reporting a problem to a MadWifi mailing list, it would be > natural to report the version of MadWifi, not of the distro. > > I guess you need to talk to your software vendor about this problem. I > don't think anybody here can help you with a version of MadWifi packaged by > someone else and stripped of a version number. > > -- > Regards, > Pavel Roskin |