Screenshot instructions:
Windows
Mac
Red Hat Linux
Ubuntu
Click URL instructions:
Right-click on ad, choose "Copy Link", then paste here →
(This may not be possible with some types of ads)
You can subscribe to this list here.
2003 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(36) |
Aug
(22) |
Sep
(90) |
Oct
(86) |
Nov
(55) |
Dec
(87) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2004 |
Jan
(97) |
Feb
(53) |
Mar
(88) |
Apr
(87) |
May
(84) |
Jun
(84) |
Jul
(38) |
Aug
(74) |
Sep
(67) |
Oct
(60) |
Nov
(96) |
Dec
(67) |
2005 |
Jan
(112) |
Feb
(131) |
Mar
(132) |
Apr
(84) |
May
(72) |
Jun
(87) |
Jul
(91) |
Aug
(94) |
Sep
(84) |
Oct
(171) |
Nov
(180) |
Dec
(114) |
2006 |
Jan
(181) |
Feb
(200) |
Mar
(207) |
Apr
(151) |
May
(185) |
Jun
(113) |
Jul
(124) |
Aug
(97) |
Sep
(120) |
Oct
(150) |
Nov
(116) |
Dec
(134) |
2007 |
Jan
(148) |
Feb
(159) |
Mar
(245) |
Apr
(155) |
May
(217) |
Jun
(181) |
Jul
(196) |
Aug
(164) |
Sep
(82) |
Oct
(114) |
Nov
(217) |
Dec
(217) |
2008 |
Jan
(146) |
Feb
(98) |
Mar
(168) |
Apr
(201) |
May
(80) |
Jun
(100) |
Jul
(189) |
Aug
(30) |
Sep
(163) |
Oct
(56) |
Nov
(70) |
Dec
(71) |
2009 |
Jan
(85) |
Feb
(38) |
Mar
(45) |
Apr
(50) |
May
(95) |
Jun
(77) |
Jul
(74) |
Aug
(36) |
Sep
(37) |
Oct
(12) |
Nov
(71) |
Dec
(10) |
2010 |
Jan
(54) |
Feb
(73) |
Mar
(69) |
Apr
(74) |
May
(31) |
Jun
(100) |
Jul
(26) |
Aug
(36) |
Sep
(36) |
Oct
(34) |
Nov
(21) |
Dec
(6) |
2011 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
(7) |
Mar
(3) |
Apr
(3) |
May
(7) |
Jun
(2) |
Jul
(7) |
Aug
(5) |
Sep
(8) |
Oct
(7) |
Nov
(4) |
Dec
|
2012 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(3) |
May
|
Jun
(1) |
Jul
(3) |
Aug
|
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(3) |
Nov
(1) |
Dec
(2) |
2013 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(2) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(10) |
Dec
|
2014 |
Jan
|
Feb
(2) |
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
|
Jun
(1) |
Jul
|
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(2) |
Oct
|
Nov
(4) |
Dec
(3) |
2015 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2017 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
(1) |
6
|
7
(1) |
8
(2) |
9
(4) |
10
(1) |
11
(3) |
12
|
13
(2) |
14
(4) |
15
(1) |
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
(2) |
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
(1) |
29
|
30
(2) |
31
(2) |
From: Nicolas Barati <nicolas.barati@gm...> - 2010-07-15 19:17:26
|
Hello, I don't know if anyone shares the same question with me, but I think I found the solution. The problem is, when IEEE80211_SEND_MGMT() is called, through this ieee80211_send_mgmt () (in ieee80211_output.c) is called. There, every candidate mgmt packet is checked if it belongs to one of the standard mgmt types: PROBE_REQ, BEACON, ASSOCIATION_REQ, PROB_RESP etc. So in the "switch (type)" block (line 1924) I added the line: case IEEE80211_FC0_SUBTYPE_RND_RESP: //... And everything went fine! The packet was sent and I saw it on the AP side. 2010/7/8 Nicolas Barati <nicolas.barati@...> > Hello all, > I want to send a management packet which can be distinguished from other > types that already exist. So, in ./net80211/ieee80211.h at line 137, on both > AP and STA sides I wrote : > #define IEEE80211_FC0_SUBTYPE_RND_RESP 0x60 > My plan was this: each time the STA receives a sertain amount of > beacons(say 35) IEEE80211_SEND_MGMT(ni, IEEE80211_FC0_SUBTYPE_RND_RESP, 0); > is called. And I would see the arrival of my packet at the AP. > On the AP side in ./net80211/ ieee80211_input.c function recv_mgmt I wrote: > > ..... > switch (subtype) { > > case IEEE80211_FC0_SUBTYPE_RND_RESP: > printk("recv_mgmt line 2984: Got a round response!\n "); > > I thought that I could see if I received my mgmt packet in dmesg, but I > didn't see anything. > I tried in STA instead of IEEE80211_SEND_MGMT(ni, > IEEE80211_FC0_SUBTYPE_RND_RESP, 0), another flag: IEEE80211_SEND_MGMT(ni, > IEEE80211_FC0_SUBTYPE_AUTH, 0). This time, on each receive (at case > IEEE80211_FC0_SUBTYPE_AUTH in recv_mgmt) the printk was displayed! > Can anyone tell me why is this happening? Is it impossible to use a new > SUBTYPE flag? I want to be notified on AP side whenever I get my mgmt > packet. Should I try a combination of already existing ones? What would you > suggest? > > Thank you! > |