Re: [toolbox] Extended Attributes
Status: Planning
Brought to you by:
jlaurens
From: Adam R. M. <ama...@ma...> - 2005-07-06 13:19:58
|
On Jul 6, 2005, at 04:41, J=E9r=F4me Laurens wrote: > > Le 6 juil. 05, =E0 00:19, Will Robertson a =E9crit : > > >> On 6 Jul 2005, at 7:03 AM, Maxwell, Adam R wrote: >> >> >>> If you store aliases as data in a plist, though (BDAlias is handy =20= >>> for this), renaming isn't a problem for the front-end specific info. >>> >> >> Ooo, that sounds much nicer than hard coded links at the top of =20 >> the document...(even if they are relative) >> > > This is not a portable solution. Aliases are mac specific. > A solution viable on other systems must also be considered Personally, I don't care about other systems, but if they must be =20 considered for the mactextoolbox, why not add another piece of =20 metadata? Store a path and an alias in the plist. >> >> >>> I think XeTeX accepts either UTF-16 or UTF-8. Also, trying to =20 >>> read Latin 1 files in as UTF-8 will cause an error in Cocoa, and =20 >>> you get nothing back (although this is arguably better than the =20 >>> corruption you get when reading MacOSRoman as UTF-8 or something). >>> >> >> In that case, it sounds like a "checksum" string at the end of the =20= >> document that is unique for each encoding (is this even possible?) =20= >> is the only way to do it if the information is going to be kept in-=20= >> file. >> > > Or an ascii name? If you can write into the byte stream without corrupting it... Adam |