Re: [toolbox] LaTeXiT 1.2 beta
Status: Planning
Brought to you by:
jlaurens
From: Herbert S. <he...@wi...> - 2005-07-03 12:53:19
|
On Jul 3, 2005, at 7:24 AM, Pierre Chatelier wrote: >>>> - Since we're talking LaTeX, it would be better to write >>>> Display (\[...\]) >>>> because $$...$$ is, to be strict, incorrect. >>>> >>>> >>> I guess this is a debatable problem. I did never use \[...\] >>> myself, since I find $$ more handy. But I am certainly not a >>> LaTeX expert. What does the majority of people expect here (this >>> is a question for the mailing list) ? >>> >>> >> >> To quote Lamport on this (L. Lamport, "LaTeX, a document >> preparation system (LaTeX2e edition), page 233): "Plain TeX's $$ >> does not work properly; it has been replaced by the LaTeX commands >> \[ and \]." >> >> In short, $$ should not be used with LaTeX. >> > Ok, that makes sense. What about $ for inline mode ? Is there > another, better shortcut ? By the way, during the latexisation, I > do not even use \[ but $\displaystyle. Is it a potential problem ? > Howdy, Many people still use $...$ for in-line maths but a ``more LaTeX way'' would be to use \(...\). Under normal circumstances they are equivalent but some packages may redefine \( and \) for their own purposes while $ (or something with the same catcode) is a TeX primitive. I'm not sure there would any difference between $\displaystyle ...$ (or the \(\displaystyle ... \)) and \[...\] besides some vertical spacing and centering. What happens if there is an array? > >>>> But I think users tend to know enough of what's going on to be >>>> able to write | Display | Inline | Text | in those buttons and >>>> put \[...\] , etc., in a tooltip. >>>> >>> Here I disagree a little. For people not familiar with LaTeX's >>> vocabulary, the use of the button becomes obvious. Here again, >>> what do people think about that ? >>> >> People not familiar with LaTeX's vocabulary will have some trouble >> using LaTeXiT anyway. I think the descriptive names (which can be >> localized) on the buttons are better, with the command displayed >> in the tooltip as a backup. >> > Finally, it's fair to say that it would be, visually, less heavy. > > Regards, > > Pierre > I agree that the description should be enough. A tooltip would be a nice addition. I'd also propose just using ``LaTeX'' rather than ``LaTexise'' (British?) or ``LaTeXize'' (US?); solves the problem. Having the ``decimal point'' be the one used with the system localization would be nice too; luckily, most folks who use TeX seem to have been internationaliz(s)ed enough to understand either. Good Luck, Herb Schulz (he...@wi...) |