Re: [toolbox] MTT
Status: Planning
Brought to you by:
jlaurens
From: <jer...@u-...> - 2005-06-24 11:08:22
|
Le 24 juin 05, =E0 12:26, Massimiliano Gubinelli a =E9crit : > > > On 24 Jun 2005, at 12:14, J=E9r=F4me Laurens wrote: > >> HI, >> >> If we happen to agree on cocoa code, objects names could be MTT=20 >> prefixed? >> > > why not just TT (since M is somewhat implicit in Cocoa...). > > Well, not on gnustep;-) I am assuming that the probability to have MTT already used is far=20 smaller than for TT. With google, MTT+cocoa gives 710 answers, whereas TT+Cocoa gives quite=20= 100x more. I know this is meaningless but it may help. Anyway, that's not so important as long as no code is publicly=20 available.= |